Missouri court rules against Tesla selling at its own dealerships in the state
【Summary】Tesla continues to try to up-end the dealership system in the U.S., which generally requires that franchise-owned dealers sell cars, vs. automakers selling directly via their own wholly owned dealerships.
Tesla continues to try to up-end the dealership system in the U.S., which generally requires that franchise-owned dealers sell cars, vs. automakers selling directly via their own wholly owned dealerships. The latest beat in he ongoing battle comes in Missouri, where Cole County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Green decided in favor of the Missouri Automobile Dealers Association (via Autoblog), effectively deciding that while Tesla can own and maintain showrooms in the state via its state dealership licence, it can't sell cars directly to consumers at those locations.
According to the terms of the judgement, Tesla can still sell its vehicles to Missourians online, and use its physical locations directly. This is the norm for most states where it's allowed to sell its vehicles, but it's still barred from selling its vehicles direct to consumers at all in six states.
The company continues to try to turn the state laws in its favor, but it faces strong resistance from powerful dealership lobbies across the country. Ultimately, Tesla wants to operate its own dealerships which can sell direct to customers, as well as selling online, and its argument for doing so is that generally speaking, franchisees don't have sufficient expertise around EVs to sell them alongside other vehicles, and it also would clearly like to own more of the overall customer experience.
In Missouri, Tesla had attempted to argue that it could issue a franchise agreement to itself, an arrangement which would satisfy the local legal requirements. Judge Green says that the law requires the franchisee be a wholly separate entity, however.
Back in May, the Wall Street Journal reported that Tesla is still trying to convince lawmakers to change their minds about direct sales at the local level, but that it's also considering mounting a federal case to challenge hold-outs based on a 2013 federal appeals court precedent involving the sale of coffins, wherein a coffin maker bypassed funeral directors in order to sell direct to consumers.
resource from: techcrunch
LeEco raises 1.08 Billion to develop its own electric vehicle
Uber's new selfie check helps make sure riders get the driver they're promised
Cruise has around 30 self-driving test cars on roads right now
Vinli tops the car apps market, adds Meineke and Cox for distribution
Volkswagen and Anhui Jianghuai in talks on building EVs for China
Watch a Volvo executive play chicken with a self-driving truck in an underground mine
AAA says that its emergency electric vehicle charging trucks served “thousands” of EVs without power
Tesla has 80% market share of Hong Kong’s growing electric vehicle market
- NHTSA Opens Investigations Into Two New Fatal Tesla Accidents
- Ford Looks to Have 100% of EV Sales Be Online
- Tesla Rival XPeng and Alibaba Cloud Set Up China’s Largest Cloud-Based Computing Center to Train Machine Learning Models for Autonomous Driving
- Rivian is Laying Off 6% of its Workforce, Citing Erratic Economy
- GM's Rebate of up to $6,000 on the Bolt EV and EUV Has a Big Stipulation
- Shares of Volvo’s EV Brand Polestar to Begin Trading on the NASDAQ After Closing on its SPAC Deal With Gores Guggenheim
- Premium Chinese EV Brand Zeekr Seeks to Raise $1 Billion in U.S. IPO, According to Sources
- Sony, Honda Sign Agreement for Joint EV Brand
- Volkswagen CEO Believes It Will Overtake Tesla in EV Sales by 2025
- Ford Unveils the F-150 Lightning Special Service Vehicle, a Fully Electric Pickup for Police Departments